[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1efa429d-7576-49da-a769-b1eba9345958@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 21:38:25 +0530
From: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Ram Kumar Dwivedi
<quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <mani@...nel.org>,
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] scsi: ufs: core: Remove unused ufshcd_res_info
structure
On 8/21/2025 5:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/08/2025 13:24, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>> From: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Remove the ufshcd_res_info structure and associated enum ufshcd_res
>> definitions from the UFS host controller header. These were previously
>> used for MCQ resource mapping but are no longer needed following recent
>> refactoring to use direct base addresses instead of multiple separate
>> resource regions
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
>
> Incomplete SoB chain.
>
> But anyway this makes no sense as independent patch. First you remove
> users of it making it redundant... and then you remove it? No.
Hi Krzysztof,
The driver changes are in the UFS Qualcomm platform driver, which uses
the definitions, while ufshcd.h is part of the UFS core driver. Hence
kept in 2 separate patch.
Thanks,
Nitin
>
> Organize your patches in logical chunks.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists