lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1efa429d-7576-49da-a769-b1eba9345958@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 21:38:25 +0530
From: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Ram Kumar Dwivedi
	<quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <mani@...nel.org>,
        <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] scsi: ufs: core: Remove unused ufshcd_res_info
 structure



On 8/21/2025 5:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/08/2025 13:24, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>> From: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Remove the ufshcd_res_info structure and associated enum ufshcd_res
>> definitions from the UFS host controller header. These were previously
>> used for MCQ resource mapping but are no longer needed following recent
>> refactoring to use direct base addresses instead of multiple separate
>> resource regions
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
> 
> Incomplete SoB chain.
> 
> But anyway this makes no sense as independent patch. First you remove
> users of it making it redundant... and then you remove it? No.

Hi Krzysztof,

The driver changes are in the UFS Qualcomm platform driver, which uses 
the definitions, while ufshcd.h is part of the UFS core driver. Hence 
kept in 2 separate patch.

Thanks,
Nitin

> 
> Organize your patches in logical chunks.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ