[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202509010944.CAAFB2ED22@keescook>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:45:44 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@...cle.com>,
Marco Bonelli <marco@...eim.net>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kconfig: Add transitional symbol attribute for
migration support
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 09:39:46AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Are you (implicitly?) saying that all previous attempts at transitional
> kconfig symbols have failed? If so, I just wasn't aware of that.
I haven't found any way to do a "proper" CONFIG transition. I looked
through past transitions and they all left stuff visible. Is there a way
to actually do this with existing kconfig?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists