lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025090110-dipper-sulfate-36cc@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 22:01:29 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mohammad Amin Hosseini <moahmmad.hosseinii@...il.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
	Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, dlechner@...libre.com,
	nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, sonic.zhang@...log.com,
	vapier@...too.org, dan.carpenter@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] staging: iio: adc: ad7816: fix race condition in SPI
 operations

On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 07:33:10PM +0330, Mohammad Amin Hosseini wrote:
> The ad7816 driver lacks proper synchronization around SPI operations
> and device state access. Concurrent access from multiple threads can
> lead to data corruption and inconsistent device state.
> 
> The driver performs sequences of GPIO pin manipulations followed by
> SPI transactions without any locking. Device state variables (mode,
> channel_id, oti_data) are also accessed without synchronization.
> 
> This bug was found through manual code review using static analysis
> techniques. The review focused on identifying unsynchronized access
> patterns to shared resources. Key indicators were:
> - GPIO pin state changes followed by SPI operations without atomicity
> - Shared state variables accessed from multiple sysfs entry points
> - No mutex or spinlock protection around sections
> - Potential for interleaved execution in multi-threaded environments
> 
> The review methodology involved tracing data flow paths and identifying
> points where concurrent access could corrupt device state or SPI
> communication sequences.
> 
> Add io_lock mutex to protect:
> - SPI transactions and GPIO sequences in read/write functions
> - Device state variables in sysfs show/store functions
> - Concurrent access to chip configuration
> 
> This prevents race conditions when multiple processes access the device
> simultaneously through sysfs attributes or device file operations.
> 
> Fixes: 7924425db04a ("staging: iio: adc: new driver for AD7816 devices")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Amin Hosseini <moahmmad.hosseinii@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Added locking to reader functions (show_mode, show_channel, show_oti)
> - Fixed incomplete reader/writer synchronization that could still race
> - Ensured all device state access is properly synchronized
> - Replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit() in all sysfs show functions
> - Use sysfs_streq() instead of strcmp() for proper input parsing
> - Implement locked/unlocked SPI function variants to prevent deadlock
> - Use channel snapshot to ensure atomic read operations
> - Fix sizeof() usage in spi_read to be more explicit (sizeof(buf))
> - Make oti write operations atomic (SPI write + shadow update under lock)
> - Fix race condition in ad7816_set_oti() by taking channel_id snapshot under lock
> - Fix return type consistency (ssize_t vs int) in show functions
> - Use chip->id instead of string comparison for channel validation
> - Add explicit cast for narrowing assignment
> - Add default case for unknown chip ID validation
> - Use cansleep GPIO variants in sleepable context
> - Improve lock documentation for protected resources
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c | 210 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 138 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch did many different things all at once, making it difficult
  to review.  All Linux kernel patches need to only do one thing at a
  time.  If you need to do multiple things (such as clean up all coding
  style issues in a file/driver), do it in a sequence of patches, each
  one doing only one thing.  This will make it easier to review the
  patches to ensure that they are correct, and to help alleviate any
  merge issues that larger patches can cause.

- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
  older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
  signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
  applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
  follow the documented rules in the
  Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
  this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ