lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afc56d3b-1fc7-48b8-a724-7abc59e06cdd@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:38:49 +0800
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, mkoutny@...e.com, peterz@...radead.org,
 zhouchengming@...edance.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 cgroups@...r.kernel.org, lujialin4@...wei.com, chenridong@...wei.com,
 libaokun1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cgroup/psi: Set of->priv to NULL upon file release



On 2025/8/26 1:32, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Greg.
> 
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 08:43:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>>> Applied to cgroup/for-6.17-fixes.
>>
>> Both or just this second patch?  Should I take the first through the
>> driver-core tree, or do you want to take it through the cgroup tree?  No
>> objection from me for you to take both :)
> 
> Sorry about the lack of clarity. Just the second one. The first one looks
> fine to me but it would probably be more appropriate if you take it.
> 
> Thanks!
> 

Hello all,

Any other opinions? Can this patch be applied?

-- 
Best regards,
Ridong


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ