[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLU497rXkuHtTl43@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:11:03 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jean-François Lessard <jefflessard3@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 07:34:17AM -0400, Jean-François Lessard wrote:
> Le 29 août 2025 00 h 23 min 22 s HAE, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> a écrit :
> >On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 10:17:59PM -0400, Jean-François Lessard wrote:
...
> >We need a real user of this before we can add them, so please do that as
> >part of a patch series.
> >
>
> I understand the "no dead code" policy, but I found existing manual
> implementations of this exact pattern in the current kernel.
>
> For example, drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c already does:
>
> struct fwnode_handle *child __free(fwnode_handle) = NULL;
> ...
> fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child) {
> ...
> }
>
> This suggests developers are already wanting this functionality but
> implementing it manually.
>
> If included with my driver series, I would only add the
> fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped() variant that I actually use,
I fully agree with Greg, please make it series out of two, I will review both
as soon as it appears in my mailbox.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists