[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <929b0908-62eb-4494-b56c-9513205d5bbf@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 08:31:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@...sung.com>, jesper.nilsson@...s.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
cw00.choi@...sung.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
tomasz.figa@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de
Cc: ksk4725@...sia.com, kenkim@...sia.com, pjsin865@...sia.com,
gwk1013@...sia.com, hgkim05@...sia.com, mingyoungbo@...sia.com,
smn1196@...sia.com, shradha.t@...sung.com, inbaraj.e@...sung.com,
swathi.ks@...sung.com, hrishikesh.d@...sung.com, dj76.yang@...sung.com,
hypmean.kim@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...s.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, soc@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible
for ARTPEC-8 SoC
On 01/09/2025 07:29, Ravi Patel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No wakeup-eint interrupts here? samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml?
>>>
>>> I don't see any use case for external wake-up interrupt here (as of now).
>>
>> It is more about hardware, not use case. Does this hardware has EINT
>> wakeup pin banks?
>
> I checked SFR sheet, ARTPEC-8 does not have any EINT wakeup pins or SFRs.
OK
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists