[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca30a6f6-f636-4d6f-9ec6-d6e02ef70852@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:33:31 +0200
From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>, Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@...iconsignals.io>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@...cinc.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: Fix CFI failure due to kpti_ng_pgd_alloc
function signature
On 29/08/2025 18:06, Mark Rutland wrote:
> The actual fix looks fine, though I suspect we should move more of this
> logic into mmu.c.
Agreed, I'll look into that. Having two separate declarations in
cpufeature.c and mmu.c is ugly and leads to the kind of mistake that I made.
The fix looks perfectly fine FWIW - not adding my Reviewed-by as I saw
Catalin took v2 already :)
- Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists