[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af4eba15-ea0c-4c56-9b0c-b53454ee5926@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 15:26:21 +0530
From: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, <rfoss@...nel.org>,
<todor.too@...il.com>, <mchehab@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <quic_svankada@...cinc.com>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] media: qcom: camss: Add support for VFE 690
On 9/1/2025 2:34 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 03/07/2025 18:19, Vikram Sharma wrote:
>> + !strcmp(clock->name, "camnoc_axi"));
>
> This is causing a regression on other platforms because they define
> camnnoc_axi but not @ the rate of the pixel clock.
>
> In fact its not very obvious why the CAMNOC AXI would want to have a
> pixel clock applied to the interconnect fabric.
>
> The following resolves the regression for me. I can either merge with
> this change or I'll have to drop the VFE690 changes until you come
> back with something else.
Hi Bryan,
updating camnoc axi to 400Mhz was required for TPG test case.
As of now you can Merge VFE patch with below change.
Meanwhile I will work on an alternative approach to set camnoc_axi and
submit as a separate patch.
>
> ➜ deckard@...ittarius-a ~/Development/qualcomm/qlt-kernel
> git:(aaa8b5ab704f3) ✗ git diff
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> index e969de74818f1..1aa0ba5ad8d60 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> @@ -913,8 +913,7 @@ static int vfe_match_clock_names(struct vfe_device
> *vfe,
>
> return (!strcmp(clock->name, vfe_name) ||
> !strcmp(clock->name, vfe_lite_name) ||
> - !strcmp(clock->name, "vfe_lite") ||
> - !strcmp(clock->name, "camnoc_axi"));
> + !strcmp(clock->name, "vfe_lite"));
>
> ---
> bod
Best regards,
Vikram
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists