[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fa1a8d5-149e-437d-aef0-587c49957197@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 13:05:02 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
To: Harikrishna Shenoy <h-shenoy@...com>
Cc: jonas@...boo.se, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch, lyude@...hat.com, luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, andy.yan@...k-chips.com, linux@...blig.org,
javierm@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devarsht@...com,
j-choudhary@...com, u-kumar1@...com, s-jain1@...com,
andrzej.hajda@...el.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, mripard@...nel.org, lumag@...nel.org,
dianders@...omium.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Set the
mhdp connector earlier in atomic_enable()
Hi,
On 11/08/2025 10:59, Harikrishna Shenoy wrote:
> From: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
>
> In case if we get errors in cdns_mhdp_link_up() or cdns_mhdp_reg_read()
> in atomic_enable, we will go to cdns_mhdp_modeset_retry_fn() and will hit
> NULL pointer while trying to access the mutex. We need the connector to
> be set before that. Unlike in legacy !(DBANC) cases, we do not have
> connector initialised in bridge_attach(). So set the mhdp->connector
> in atomic_enable() earlier to avoid possible NULL pointer.
>
> Fixes: c932ced6b585 ("drm/tidss: Update encoder/bridge chain connect model")
> Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
> ---
> .../drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c | 20 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
> index c2ce3d6e5a88..b2f5a48cac2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
> @@ -1759,12 +1759,21 @@ static void cdns_mhdp_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> struct drm_bridge_state *new_state;
> const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> u32 resp;
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> dev_dbg(mhdp->dev, "bridge enable\n");
>
> mutex_lock(&mhdp->link_mutex);
>
> + mhdp->connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(state,
> + bridge->encoder);
> + if (WARN_ON(!mhdp->connector))
> + goto out;
> +
> + conn_state = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state(state, mhdp->connector);
> + if (WARN_ON(!conn_state))
> + goto out;
You are just moving code here, but... Shouldn't these be errors? If I
read this right, ret is 0 here, and thus if we hit either of those
issues above, we'll return 0.
Tomi
> +
> if (mhdp->plugged && !mhdp->link_up) {
> ret = cdns_mhdp_link_up(mhdp);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1784,15 +1793,6 @@ static void cdns_mhdp_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> cdns_mhdp_reg_write(mhdp, CDNS_DPTX_CAR,
> resp | CDNS_VIF_CLK_EN | CDNS_VIF_CLK_RSTN);
>
> - mhdp->connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(state,
> - bridge->encoder);
> - if (WARN_ON(!mhdp->connector))
> - goto out;
> -
> - conn_state = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state(state, mhdp->connector);
> - if (WARN_ON(!conn_state))
> - goto out;
> -
> if (mhdp->hdcp_supported &&
> mhdp->hw_state == MHDP_HW_READY &&
> conn_state->content_protection ==
Powered by blists - more mailing lists