Message-ID: <bfe1ae86-981a-4bd5-a96d-2879ef1b3af2@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 12:43:42 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>,
 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com,
 willy@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
 vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, vishal.moola@...il.com,
 linux@...linux.org.uk, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, deller@....de,
 agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
 gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, andreas@...sler.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
 luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
 bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, chris@...kel.net,
 jcmvbkbc@...il.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
 jack@...e.cz, weixugc@...gle.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
 rientjes@...gle.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, thuth@...hat.com,
 broonie@...nel.org, osalvador@...e.de, jfalempe@...hat.com,
 mpe@...erman.id.au, nysal@...ux.ibm.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, conduct@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer
 parameters

On 01.09.25 12:20, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:04 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
> <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> +cc CoC.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
>>> <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>> You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how
>>>> things work.
>>>
>>> This accusation of yours is NOT:
>>> - Using welcoming and inclusive language
>>> - Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
>>> - Showing empathy towards other community members
>>>
>>> This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack.
>>
>> It is absolutely none of these things, you admitted yourself you thought the
>> review was stupid and you used an LLM to adhere to it, clearly with bad faith
>> itnent.
> 
> There must be a huge misunderstanding somewhere. I and you guys must
> be talking in a completely different language. None of that is true
> from my perspective.
> 
> I never called any review stupid, nor did I admit that. I disagreed,
> but that's not the same thing. Remember when I told you "Let's agree
> to disagree"? It's perfectly fine to have different opinions. Please
> don't mix that up.
> 
>>>
>>> (I'm also still waiting for your reply to
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@mail.gmail.com/
>>> )
>>
>> Your behaviour there was appalling and clearly a personal attack.
> 
> It was not. Maybe you felt that way, but I did not intend you to feel
> that way. I would like to find out why you felt that way (because I
> don't have the slightest clue), that's why I asked, and why I'm
> waiting for your reply. If you would reply, maybe we could clear
> things up and resolve the misunderstanding.
> 
> It sounds like I won't ever have the chance to do that, so... farewell.

Let's all calm down a bit.

Max, I think this series here is valuable, and you can see that from the 
engagement from reviewers (this is a *good* thing, I sometimes wish I 
would get feedback that would help me improve my submissions).

So if you don't want to follow-up on this series to polish the patch 
descriptions etc,, let me now and I (or someone else around here) can 
drag it over the finishing line.

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists