[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe4bfa9d-2e1f-4f2c-92b4-7ac827ba471e@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 13:06:37 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, vishal.moola@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, deller@....de,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, andreas@...sler.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, chris@...kel.net,
jcmvbkbc@...il.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
jack@...e.cz, weixugc@...gle.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, thuth@...hat.com,
broonie@...nel.org, osalvador@...e.de, jfalempe@...hat.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, nysal@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, conduct@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer
parameters
On 01.09.25 12:56, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 12:43:42PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's all calm down a bit.
>
> I am guessing you are not contradicting what I'm saying here but instead
> trying to find a solution as to the _series_.
Of course.
>
> However, and I'm sure you agree - I want to underline my view that treating
> people with disrespect should not be tolerated in the kernel.
Absolutely.
And just to add some of my personal thought: a good patch description
makes the life of reviewers easier. Not caring about that can be
interpreted by reviewers as a sign of not caring about review(ers).
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists