[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250901112551.35534-2-zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 19:25:49 +0800
From: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
To: "Rafael J . wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: zhenglifeng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] cpufreq: Drop redundant freq_table parameter
Since commit e0b3165ba521 ("cpufreq: add 'freq_table' in struct
cpufreq_policy"),
freq_table has been stored in struct cpufreq_policy instead of being
maintained separately.
However, several helpers in freq_table.c still take both policy and
freq_table as parameters, even though policy->freq_table can always be
used. This leads to redundant function arguments and increases the chance
of inconsistencies.
This patch removes the unnecessary freq_table argument from these functions
and updates their callers to only pass policy. This makes the code simpler,
more consistent, and avoids duplication.
Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 14 ++++++--------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 7 +++----
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index fc7eace8b65b..76ef82d75ba2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2792,7 +2792,7 @@ int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state)
if (!policy->freq_table)
return -ENXIO;
- ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, policy->freq_table);
+ ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Policy frequency update failed\n", __func__);
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index 35de513af6c9..d5111ee56e38 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -28,10 +28,9 @@ static bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return false;
}
-int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
+int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *table = policy->freq_table;
unsigned int min_freq = ~0;
unsigned int max_freq = 0;
unsigned int freq;
@@ -65,10 +64,9 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return 0;
}
-int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy,
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
+int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy)
{
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *table = policy->freq_table;
unsigned int freq, prev_smaller = 0;
bool found = false;
@@ -110,7 +108,7 @@ int cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy)
if (!policy->freq_table)
return -ENODEV;
- return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(policy, policy->freq_table);
+ return cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(policy);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify);
@@ -354,7 +352,7 @@ int cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;
}
- ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, policy->freq_table);
+ ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 95f3807c8c55..40966512ea18 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -780,11 +780,10 @@ struct cpufreq_frequency_table {
else
-int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
+int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
+
+int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy);
-int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy,
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
int cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy);
int cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists