lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLWQSAX1ZKg6IiTb@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 15:23:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Adrian Barnaś <abarnas@...gle.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging:media: atomisp: Whitespaces cleanup in vmem.c

On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 09:10:50AM +0000, Adrian Barnaś wrote:
> Whitespaces cleanup to conform with kernel style and improve readability.

Strange...

...

>  /* subword bits move like this:         MSB[____xxxx____]LSB -> MSB[00000000xxxx]LSB */
> -static inline unsigned long long
> -subword(unsigned long long w, unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
> +static inline unsigned long long subword(unsigned long long w, unsigned int start,
> +					 unsigned int end)
>  {
>  	return (w & (((1ULL << (end - 1)) - 1) << 1 | 1)) >> start;
>  }
>  
>  /* inverse subword bits move like this: MSB[xxxx____xxxx]LSB -> MSB[xxxx0000xxxx]LSB */
> -static inline unsigned long long
> -inv_subword(unsigned long long w, unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
> +static inline unsigned long long inv_subword(unsigned long long w, unsigned int start,
> +					     unsigned int end)
>  {
>  	return w & (~(((1ULL << (end - 1)) - 1) << 1 | 1) | ((1ULL << start) - 1));
>  }

These two were just "fixed according to the kernel coding style" and here
again. This is odd.

Note, the style after the first patch is okay. I dunno what's wrong with it.

...

> -void isp_vmem_load(
> -    const isp_ID_t		ID,
> -    const t_vmem_elem	*from,
> -    t_vmem_elem		*to,
> -    unsigned int elems) /* In t_vmem_elem */
> +void isp_vmem_load(const isp_ID_t ID, const t_vmem_elem *from, t_vmem_elem *to,
> +		   unsigned int elems) /* In t_vmem_elem */

Please, (re)move trailing comments somewhere else.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ