[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5397026-92eb-4a43-9534-954b43ab9305@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 16:29:33 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...nai.com>,
Gang Yan <yangang@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] mptcp: misc. features for v6.18
Hello,
On 01/09/2025 11:39, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> This series contains 4 independent new features:
>
> - Patch 1: use HMAC-SHA256 library instead of open-coded HMAC.
>
> - Patches 2-3: make ADD_ADDR retransmission timeout adaptive + simplify
> selftests.
I just noticed that NIPA reported some issues due to these 2 patches. In
short, some packets (MPTCP ADD_ADDR notifications) can now be
retransmitted quicker, but some tests check MIB counters and don't
expect retransmissions. If the environment is a bit slow, it is possible
to have more retransmissions. We should adapt the tests to avoid false
positives.
Is it possible to drop just these two patches? Or do you prefer to mark
the whole series as "Changes requested"?
> - Patch 4: selftests: check for unexpected fallback counter increments.
>
> - Patches 5-6: record subflows in RPS table, for aRFS support.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists