lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMgjq7D9uO58213Shb5sHx=ebvUdvO1mOnaVdb=dOY2Zr1QoEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 00:38:52 +0800
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, 
	Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, 
	Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, 
	Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, 
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, 
	Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] mm, swap: use unified helper for swap cache look up

On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 7:22 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 22.08.25 21:20, Kairui Song wrote:
> > From: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
> >
> > Always use swap_cache_get_folio for swap cache folio look up. The reason
> > we are not using it in all places is that it also updates the readahead
> > info, and some callsites want to avoid that.
> >
> > So decouple readahead update with swap cache lookup into a standalone
> > helper, let the caller call the readahead update helper if that's
> > needed. And convert all swap cache lookups to use swap_cache_get_folio.
> >
> > After this commit, there are only three special cases for accessing swap
> > cache space now: huge memory splitting, migration and shmem replacing,
> > because they need to lock the Xarray. Following commits will wrap their
> > accesses to the swap cache too with special helpers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
> > ---
> >   mm/memory.c      |  6 ++-
> >   mm/mincore.c     |  3 +-
> >   mm/shmem.c       |  4 +-
> >   mm/swap.h        | 13 +++++--
> >   mm/swap_state.c  | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >   mm/swapfile.c    | 11 +++---
> >   mm/userfaultfd.c |  5 +--
> >   7 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > index d9de6c056179..10ef528a5f44 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > @@ -4660,9 +4660,11 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> >       if (unlikely(!si))
> >               goto out;
> >
> > -     folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry, vma, vmf->address);
> > -     if (folio)
> > +     folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
> > +     if (folio) {
> > +             swap_update_readahead(folio, vma, vmf->address);
> >               page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
> > +     }
> >       swapcache = folio;
> >
> >       if (!folio) {
> > diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
> > index 2f3e1816a30d..8ec4719370e1 100644
> > --- a/mm/mincore.c
> > +++ b/mm/mincore.c
> > @@ -76,8 +76,7 @@ static unsigned char mincore_swap(swp_entry_t entry, bool shmem)
> >               if (!si)
> >                       return 0;
> >       }
> > -     folio = filemap_get_entry(swap_address_space(entry),
> > -                               swap_cache_index(entry));
> > +     folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
> >       if (shmem)
> >               put_swap_device(si);
> >       /* The swap cache space contains either folio, shadow or NULL */
> > diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> > index 13cc51df3893..e9d0d2784cd5 100644
> > --- a/mm/shmem.c
> > +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> > @@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> >       }
> >
> >       /* Look it up and read it in.. */
> > -     folio = swap_cache_get_folio(swap, NULL, 0);
> > +     folio = swap_cache_get_folio(swap);
> >       if (!folio) {
> >               if (data_race(si->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO)) {
> >                       /* Direct swapin skipping swap cache & readahead */
> > @@ -2379,6 +2379,8 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> >                       count_vm_event(PGMAJFAULT);
> >                       count_memcg_event_mm(fault_mm, PGMAJFAULT);
> >               }
> > +     } else {
> > +             swap_update_readahead(folio, NULL, 0);
> >       }
> >
> >       if (order > folio_order(folio)) {
> > diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
> > index 1ae44d4193b1..efb6d7ff9f30 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap.h
> > +++ b/mm/swap.h
> > @@ -62,8 +62,7 @@ void delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio);
> >   void clear_shadow_from_swap_cache(int type, unsigned long begin,
> >                                 unsigned long end);
> >   void swapcache_clear(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entry, int nr);
> > -struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry,
> > -             struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr);
> > +struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry);
> >   struct folio *read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> >               struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> >               struct swap_iocb **plug);
> > @@ -74,6 +73,8 @@ struct folio *swap_cluster_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t flag,
> >               struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx);
> >   struct folio *swapin_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t flag,
> >               struct vm_fault *vmf);
> > +void swap_update_readahead(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                        unsigned long addr);
> >
> >   static inline unsigned int folio_swap_flags(struct folio *folio)
> >   {
> > @@ -159,6 +160,11 @@ static inline struct folio *swapin_readahead(swp_entry_t swp, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> >       return NULL;
> >   }
> >
> > +static inline void swap_update_readahead(struct folio *folio,
> > +             struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> >   static inline int swap_writeout(struct folio *folio,
> >               struct swap_iocb **swap_plug)
> >   {
> > @@ -169,8 +175,7 @@ static inline void swapcache_clear(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entr
> >   {
> >   }
> >
> > -static inline struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry,
> > -             struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> > +static inline struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
> >   {
> >       return NULL;
> >   }
> > diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
> > index 99513b74b5d8..ff9eb761a103 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap_state.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap_state.c
> > @@ -69,6 +69,21 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
> >       printk("Total swap = %lukB\n", K(total_swap_pages));
> >   }
> >
> > +/*
>
> While at it, proper kerneldoc?
>
> /**
>
> etc.
>
> Also documenting that it will only return a valid folio pointer or NULL

Good suggestion. I added some kerneldoc in later commit for this
function, do it earlier here is better.

>
> > + * Lookup a swap entry in the swap cache. A found folio will be returned
> > + * unlocked and with its refcount incremented.
> > + *
> > + * Caller must lock the swap device or hold a reference to keep it valid.
> > + */
> > +struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
> > +{
> > +     struct folio *folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry),
> > +                                             swap_cache_index(entry));
> > +     if (!IS_ERR(folio))
> > +             return folio;
> > +     return NULL;
>
> Maybe better as (avoid one !)
>
> if (IS_ERR(folio))
>         return NULL;
> return folio;
>
> or simply
>
> return IS_ERR(folio) ? NULL : folio.
>
> > +}
> > +
> >   void *get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
> >   {
> >       struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
> > @@ -273,54 +288,40 @@ static inline bool swap_use_vma_readahead(void)
> >   }
> >
> >   /*
> > - * Lookup a swap entry in the swap cache. A found folio will be returned
> > - * unlocked and with its refcount incremented - we rely on the kernel
> > - * lock getting page table operations atomic even if we drop the folio
> > - * lock before returning.
> > - *
> > - * Caller must lock the swap device or hold a reference to keep it valid.
> > + * Update the readahead statistics of a vma or globally.
> >    */
> > -struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry,
> > -             struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
>
> This also sounds like a good kerneldoc candidate :)
>
> In particular, documenting that it is valid to pass in vma == NULL (in
> which case the addr is ignored).

Agree, I forgot this one, will add some doc.

>
> > +void swap_update_readahead(struct folio *folio,
> > +                        struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                        unsigned long addr)
> >   {
>
>
> Apart from that LGTM.

Thanks!

>
> --
> Cheers
>
> David / dhildenb
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ