[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c960400-ef46-45aa-85d9-d0e1c60b9c0d@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:05:01 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, hch@...radead.org, colyli@...nel.org,
hare@...e.de, dlemoal@...nel.org, tieren@...as.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com, song@...nel.org, kmo@...erainc.com,
satyat@...gle.com, ebiggers@...gle.com, neil@...wn.name,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, johnny.chenyi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/15] block: add QUEUE_FLAG_BIO_ISSUE
On 8/31/25 8:32 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> @@ -372,7 +372,10 @@ static inline void blkg_put(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
>
> static inline void blkcg_bio_issue_init(struct bio *bio)
> {
> - bio->issue_time_ns = blk_time_get_ns();
> + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
> +
> + if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_BIO_ISSUE, &q->queue_flags))
> + bio->issue_time_ns = blk_time_get_ns();
> }
>
> static inline void blkcg_use_delay(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
> diff --git a/block/blk-iolatency.c b/block/blk-iolatency.c
> index 554b191a6892..c9b3bd12c87c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-iolatency.c
> +++ b/block/blk-iolatency.c
> @@ -767,6 +767,7 @@ static int blk_iolatency_init(struct gendisk *disk)
> if (ret)
> goto err_qos_del;
>
> + blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_BIO_ISSUE, disk->queue);
> timer_setup(&blkiolat->timer, blkiolatency_timer_fn, 0);
> INIT_WORK(&blkiolat->enable_work, blkiolatency_enable_work_fn);
Shouldn't QUEUE_FLAG_BIO_ISSUE be cleared when initializing
bio->issue_time_ns is no longer necessary?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists