linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add drm-rust tree for Rust DRM drivers and infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DCIILHRHQ2SP.3MYD6KEP72GV9@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 20:09:54 +0200
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
To: "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <airlied@...il.com>, <simona@...ll.ch>,
 <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 <acourbot@...dia.com>, <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
 <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add drm-rust tree for Rust DRM drivers and
 infrastructure

On Tue Sep 2, 2025 at 7:57 PM CEST, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 07:49:56PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On Tue Sep 2, 2025 at 7:40 PM CEST, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > Would it make sense to add the drm-misc maintainers as reviewers for the
>> > bindings?
>> 
>> This will get you all the driver patches in your inbox as well, maybe
>> discarding the following hunk is what we want instead?
>
> I guess we would receive just as many patches as we do today :)
>
>> 	@@ -8079,7 +8079,6 @@ F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/
>> 	 F:	Documentation/gpu/
>> 	 F:	drivers/gpu/drm/
>> 	 F:	drivers/gpu/vga/
>> 	-F:	rust/kernel/drm/
>> 	 F:	include/drm/drm
>> 	 F:	include/linux/vga*
>> 	 F:	include/uapi/drm/
>
> That's not really what I meant, what I meant was that rust/kernel/drm/
> is the only thing I'm really interested on, but we don't need to
> maintain it if it makes more sense to do so separately.

Yeah, the idea was to discard the hunk above and still keep rust/kernel/drm/ on
this new entry, so you get *only* that, but not all the driver patches.

As far as file maintainership is concerned, we have group maintainership on the
commmon infrastructure anyways.

Your call, happy to add you as reviewers to the new entry too. :)

> BTW, we should probably add to drm-misc
>
> X: drivers/gpu/drm/nova

Makes sense.

> because we have a catch-all at the moment.
>
> Maxime