linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fix spelling mistakes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <A33D792E-4773-458B-ACF4-5E66B1FCB5AC@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 13:05:09 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Ranganath V N <vnranganath.20@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
 djwong@...nel.org, corbet@....net, pbonzini@...hat.com,
 laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fix spelling mistakes

On September 2, 2025 12:59:05 PM PDT, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>On 02/09/2025 21:38, Ranganath V N wrote:
>> Corrected a few spelling mistakes to improve the readability.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Ranganath V N <vnranganath.20@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +-
>>  Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst           | 2 +-
>>  Documentation/virt/kvm/review-checklist.rst              | 2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
>> index 46d0b036c97e..191085b0d5e8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ I. For patch submitters
>>       any DTS patches, regardless whether using existing or new bindings, should
>>       be placed at the end of patchset to indicate no dependency of drivers on
>>       the DTS.  DTS will be anyway applied through separate tree or branch, so
>> -     different order would indicate the serie is non-bisectable.
>> +     different order would indicate the series is non-bisectable.
>That's not entirely a spelling mistake
>https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/serie#English
>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof
>

Obsolete.  Close enough for me. 


~Randy