lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLaPHctB8IgtD_Sg@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 23:30:53 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	anthony <antmbox@...ngman.org.uk>,
	Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, colyli@...nel.org, hare@...e.de,
	tieren@...as.com, axboe@...nel.dk, tj@...nel.org,
	josef@...icpanda.com, song@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	neil@...wn.name, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
	yangerkun@...wei.com, johnny.chenyi@...wei.com,
	"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/7] md/raid10: convert read/write to use
 bio_submit_split()

On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 07:18:01AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> BTW, do we realistically expect atomic writes HW support and bad blocks ever
> to meet?

That's the point I'm trying to make.  bad block tracking is stupid
with modern hardware.  Both SSDs and HDDs are overprovisioned on
physical "blocks", and once they run out fine grained bad block tracking
is not going to help.  І really do not understand why md even tries
to do this bad block tracking, but claiming to support atomic writes
while it does is actively harmful.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ