[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250902070019.856305-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 15:00:19 +0800
From: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>
To: xunil@...omasoft.com
Cc: amadeus@....edu.cn,
andrew@...n.ch,
conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
heiko@...ech.de,
krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add HINLINK H68K
Hi,
> So what I said earlier regarding rgmii vs rgmii-id DOES NOT hold up
> under more rigorous and careful testing.
So the following question does not exist?
>> Changing this makes a huge difference in the ethernet throughput speed. With
>> rgmii-id mode specified, throughput is about 6.5 Mbs. Changing this to rgmii
>> mode increases throughput to about 960 Mbs.
If the iperf3 test does not reach Gigabit, you can run it in
multiple threads. e.g. `iperf3 -c xxx -P 4`
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists