[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <130482e9-8363-6051-5fc6-549cf9aad57b@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 09:50:50 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
hch@...radead.org, colyli@...nel.org, hare@...e.de, dlemoal@...nel.org,
tieren@...as.com, axboe@...nel.dk, tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com,
song@...nel.org, kmo@...erainc.com, satyat@...gle.com, ebiggers@...gle.com,
neil@...wn.name, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com, johnny.chenyi@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 00/15] block: fix disordered IO in the case
recursive split
Hi,
在 2025/09/01 22:09, Bart Van Assche 写道:
> On 8/31/25 8:32 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> This set is just test for raid5 for now, see details in patch 9;
>
> Does this mean that this patch series doesn't fix reordering caused by
> recursive splitting for zoned block devices? A test case that triggers
> an I/O error is available here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/a8a714c7-de3d-4cc9-8c23-38b8dc06f5bb@acm.org/
>
I'll try this test.
zoned block device is bypassed in patch 14 by:
+ if (split && !bdev_is_zoned(bio->bi_bdev))
+ bio_list_add_head(¤t->bio_list[0], bio);
If I can find a reporducer for zoned block, and verify that recursive
split can be fixed as well, I can remove the checking for zoned devices
in the next verison.
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> I have not yet had the time to review this patch series but plan to take
> a look soon.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists