[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB845991442136C0BEF0540D6A8806A@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 02:24:49 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Vincent Mailhol
<mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay
Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Aswath
Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha
Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Frank Li
<frank.li@....com>, Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP
TJA105X/1048
Hi Conor,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can:
> Document NXP TJA105X/1048
>
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 07:54:01PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:18:11AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > The TJA105[1,7] is a high-speed CAN transceiver which is a
> > > pin-compatible alternative for TI TCAN1043 with sleep mode
> > > supported, and has a compatible programming model, therefore
> use ti,tcan1043 as fallback compatible.
> > >
> > > The TJA1048 is a dual high-speed CAN transceiver with sleep mode
> supported.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 30
> ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > > index
> > >
> 4a8c3829d85d3c4a4963750d03567c1c345beb91..f8e0c24856a2ba83
> b5c988b246
> > > 464f47e11a032f 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-
> can.yaml
> > > @@ -19,18 +19,25 @@ properties:
> > > - enum:
> > > - microchip,ata6561
> > > - const: ti,tcan1042
> > > + - items:
> > > + - enum:
> > > + - nxp,tja1051
> > > + - nxp,tja1057
> > > + - const: ti,tcan1043
> > > - enum:
> > > - ti,tcan1042
> > > - ti,tcan1043
> > > + - nxp,tja1048
> > > - nxp,tjr1443
> > >
> > > '#phy-cells':
> > > - const: 0
> > > + enum: [0, 1]
> > >
> > > standby-gpios:
> > > description:
> > > gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver
> > > - maxItems: 1
> > > + minItems: 1
> > > + maxItems: 2
> >
> > You're adding a second standby gpio, which one is which?
> > I assume you mean that item 1 is stbn1 and item 2 is stbn 2 for
> tja1048.
Yes. There are two standby pins.
> > Might be kinda obvious, but I think it should be mentioned.
I could update description as below.
"
description:
gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver. For two Items,
item 1 is for stbn1, item 2 is for stbn2.
"
> >
> > tja105{1,7} don't have a standby gpio, but they do have a silent
> mode.
Right. Tja105{1,7} has a pin S for silent mode.
> > silent mode seems fundamentally different to standby, since the
> > receiver still works. Seems like that should be handled differently, no?
>
> The docs for standby mode for the tcan1043 don't match with the
> tja1051, "Standby mode is a low power mode where the driver and
> receiver are disabled," so does the fallback compatible even make
> sense? Seems like a combination of enable and standby gpios are used
> to put the tcan device into silent mode but the tja1051 has a pin for
> that alone and seemingly does not support standby at all?
Thanks for looking into the details. I also read more into the datasheet.
Tcan1043:
EN nSTB
H H ---> normal mode
L H ---> slient mode
H L ---> standby mode
L X --->off mode
TJA1051
EN S
H L --> normal mode
H H --> slient mode
L X --> off mode
Your analysis is correct. silent is different with standby,
but we only wanna to use normal and off mode
If we need to handle differently, I need
to add a new optional property
silent-gpios:
description:
gpio node to toggle silent signal on transceiver
minItems: 1
How do you think?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> >
> > >
> > > enable-gpios:
> > > description:
> > > @@ -53,6 +60,25 @@ required:
> > > - compatible
> > > - '#phy-cells'
> > >
> > > +allOf:
> > > + - if:
> > > + properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + contains:
> > > + const: nxp,tja1048
> > > + then:
> > > + properties:
> > > + '#phy-cells':
> > > + const: 1
> > > + standby-gpios:
> > > + minItems: 2
> > > + else:
> > > + properties:
> > > + '#phy-cells':
> > > + const: 0
> > > + standby-gpios:
> > > + maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > additionalProperties: false
> > >
> > > examples:
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1
> > >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists