linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cdx: Fix device node reference leak in cdx_msi_domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025090236-fernlike-ovary-ed81@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 11:33:41 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Abhijit Gangurde <abhijit.gangurde@....com>,
	Nikhil Agarwal <nikhil.agarwal@....com>,
	Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@....com>,
	Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@....com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cdx: Fix device node reference leak in
 cdx_msi_domain_init

On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:05:45AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Add missing of_node_put() call to release
> > the device node reference obtained via of_parse_phandle().
> 
> You may occasionally put more than 58 characters into text lines
> of such a change description.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17-rc4#n638
> 
> 
> How do you think about to append parentheses to the function name
> in the summary phrase?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> 

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot