[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLbAvirCgCfpXaVK@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 13:02:38 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
yuanchu@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
surenb@...gle.com, vishal.moola@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, deller@....de,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, andreas@...sler.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
weixugc@...gle.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, thuth@...hat.com,
broonie@...nel.org, osalvador@...e.de, jfalempe@...hat.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, nysal@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer
parameters
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 10:50:09PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> For improved const-correctness in the low-level memory-management
> subsystem, which provides a basis for further const-ification further
> up the call stack (e.g. filesystems).
>
> This patch series splitted into smaller patches was initially posted
> as a single large patch:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250827192233.447920-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com/
>
> I started this work when I tried to constify the Ceph filesystem code,
> but found that to be impossible because many "mm" functions accept
> non-const pointer, even though they modify nothing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists