linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: bus: fix device node reference leak in __cci_ace_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025090254-taste-december-f544@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 13:11:58 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: bus: fix device node reference leak in
 __cci_ace_get_port

On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:44:10AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Add missing of_node_put() call to release
> > the device node reference obtained via of_parse_phandle().
> 
> 1. You may occasionally put more than 58 characters into text lines
>    of such a change description.
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17-rc4#n638
> 
> 2. Would you like to increase the application of scope-based resource management?
>    https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc4/source/include/linux/of.h#L138
> 
> 3. How do you think about to append parentheses to the function name
>    in the summary phrase?
> 

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot