[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250902120221.GEaLbczaZ1RPY7dGKH@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 14:02:21 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/22] x86/boot: Drop redundant RMPADJUST in SEV SVSM
presence check
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:22:13PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> - /*
> - * Running at VMPL0 is not required if an SVSM is present and the hypervisor
> - * supports the required SVSM GHCB events.
> - */
> - if (ret &&
> - !(snp_vmpl && (hv_features & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP_MULTI_VMPL)))
> + if (snp_vmpl > 0 && !(hv_features & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP_MULTI_VMPL))
Yeah, it is unsigned:
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
index 973ca206794a..808211b09424 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ void sev_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
* Running at VMPL0 is required unless an SVSM is present and
* the hypervisor supports the required SVSM GHCB events.
*/
- if (snp_vmpl > 0 && !(hv_features & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP_MULTI_VMPL))
+ if (snp_vmpl && !(hv_features & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP_MULTI_VMPL))
sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_LINUX, GHCB_TERM_NOT_VMPL0);
}
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists