[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250903-slub-percpu-caches-v7-8-71c114cdefef@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 14:59:50 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, vbabka@...e.cz
Subject: [PATCH v7 08/21] slab: allow NUMA restricted allocations to use
percpu sheaves
Currently allocations asking for a specific node explicitly or via
mempolicy in strict_numa node bypass percpu sheaves. Since sheaves
contain mostly local objects, we can try allocating from them if the
local node happens to be the requested node or allowed by the mempolicy.
If we find the object from percpu sheaves is not from the expected node,
we skip the sheaves - this should be rare.
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
mm/slub.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 8e34d6afccf41efad0c6620126e09f874bdcb663..d3d054579a8af710a0cbf68fe9688565c84d3609 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -4816,18 +4816,43 @@ __pcs_replace_empty_main(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs,
}
static __fastpath_inline
-void *alloc_from_pcs(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp)
+void *alloc_from_pcs(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp, int node)
{
struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs;
+ bool node_requested;
void *object;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
- if (static_branch_unlikely(&strict_numa)) {
- if (current->mempolicy)
- return NULL;
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&strict_numa) &&
+ node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
+
+ struct mempolicy *mpol = current->mempolicy;
+
+ if (mpol) {
+ /*
+ * Special BIND rule support. If the local node
+ * is in permitted set then do not redirect
+ * to a particular node.
+ * Otherwise we apply the memory policy to get
+ * the node we need to allocate on.
+ */
+ if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND ||
+ !node_isset(numa_mem_id(), mpol->nodes))
+
+ node = mempolicy_slab_node();
+ }
}
#endif
+ node_requested = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && node != NUMA_NO_NODE;
+
+ /*
+ * We assume the percpu sheaves contain only local objects although it's
+ * not completely guaranteed, so we verify later.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(node_requested && node != numa_mem_id()))
+ return NULL;
+
if (!local_trylock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock))
return NULL;
@@ -4839,7 +4864,21 @@ void *alloc_from_pcs(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfp)
return NULL;
}
- object = pcs->main->objects[--pcs->main->size];
+ object = pcs->main->objects[pcs->main->size - 1];
+
+ if (unlikely(node_requested)) {
+ /*
+ * Verify that the object was from the node we want. This could
+ * be false because of cpu migration during an unlocked part of
+ * the current allocation or previous freeing process.
+ */
+ if (folio_nid(virt_to_folio(object)) != node) {
+ local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ pcs->main->size--;
local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
@@ -4939,8 +4978,8 @@ static __fastpath_inline void *slab_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list
if (unlikely(object))
goto out;
- if (s->cpu_sheaves && node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- object = alloc_from_pcs(s, gfpflags);
+ if (s->cpu_sheaves)
+ object = alloc_from_pcs(s, gfpflags, node);
if (!object)
object = __slab_alloc_node(s, gfpflags, node, addr, orig_size);
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists