[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250903-slub-percpu-caches-v7-6-71c114cdefef@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 14:59:48 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, vbabka@...e.cz
Subject: [PATCH v7 06/21] slab: determine barn status racily outside of
lock
The possibility of many barn operations is determined by the current
number of full or empty sheaves. Taking the barn->lock just to find out
that e.g. there are no empty sheaves results in unnecessary overhead and
lock contention. Thus perform these checks outside of the lock with a
data_race() annotated variable read and fail quickly without taking the
lock.
Checks for sheaf availability that racily succeed have to be obviously
repeated under the lock for correctness, but we can skip repeating
checks if there are too many sheaves on the given list as the limits
don't need to be strict.
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
mm/slub.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index c6ca9b60acd15520410ac08d252bb09e111db6f1..d078630f7211b617f390a16fa080da8a1df45355 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2801,9 +2801,12 @@ static struct slab_sheaf *barn_get_empty_sheaf(struct node_barn *barn)
struct slab_sheaf *empty = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
+ if (!data_race(barn->nr_empty))
+ return NULL;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&barn->lock, flags);
- if (barn->nr_empty) {
+ if (likely(barn->nr_empty)) {
empty = list_first_entry(&barn->sheaves_empty,
struct slab_sheaf, barn_list);
list_del(&empty->barn_list);
@@ -2850,6 +2853,9 @@ static struct slab_sheaf *barn_get_full_or_empty_sheaf(struct node_barn *barn)
struct slab_sheaf *sheaf = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
+ if (!data_race(barn->nr_full) && !data_race(barn->nr_empty))
+ return NULL;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&barn->lock, flags);
if (barn->nr_full) {
@@ -2880,9 +2886,12 @@ barn_replace_empty_sheaf(struct node_barn *barn, struct slab_sheaf *empty)
struct slab_sheaf *full = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
+ if (!data_race(barn->nr_full))
+ return NULL;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&barn->lock, flags);
- if (barn->nr_full) {
+ if (likely(barn->nr_full)) {
full = list_first_entry(&barn->sheaves_full, struct slab_sheaf,
barn_list);
list_del(&full->barn_list);
@@ -2906,19 +2915,23 @@ barn_replace_full_sheaf(struct node_barn *barn, struct slab_sheaf *full)
struct slab_sheaf *empty;
unsigned long flags;
+ /* we don't repeat this check under barn->lock as it's not critical */
+ if (data_race(barn->nr_full) >= MAX_FULL_SHEAVES)
+ return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
+ if (!data_race(barn->nr_empty))
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&barn->lock, flags);
- if (barn->nr_full >= MAX_FULL_SHEAVES) {
- empty = ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
- } else if (!barn->nr_empty) {
- empty = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- } else {
+ if (likely(barn->nr_empty)) {
empty = list_first_entry(&barn->sheaves_empty, struct slab_sheaf,
barn_list);
list_del(&empty->barn_list);
list_add(&full->barn_list, &barn->sheaves_full);
barn->nr_empty--;
barn->nr_full++;
+ } else {
+ empty = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&barn->lock, flags);
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists