[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250903134126.GA27641@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 15:41:26 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/1] x86/shstk: don't create the shadow stack for
PF_USER_WORKERs
Dave, et al, please review.
Our discussion with Rick was confusing and we can't convince each other.
Perhaps this is my fault. So let me resend 4/5 from this series
[PATCH v2 0/5] x86/fpu: don't abuse x86_task_fpu(PF_USER_WORKER) in .regset_get() paths
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250822153603.GA27103@redhat.com/
as a separate patch. I tried to update the changelog.
Again, to me it looks like a simple cleanup which makes sense regardless,
but please correct me if I am wrong.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists