linux-kernel - [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2251447.irdbgypaU6@rafael.j.wysocki>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 16:59:47 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>,
 Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject:
 [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving
 __free()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Follow cleanup.h recommendations and define and assign a variable
in one statement when __free() is used.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---

Zhang, I said the code structure here was intentional, but that was before
the cleanup.h recommendation was pointed out to me.

---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -1502,9 +1502,7 @@ static void __intel_pstate_update_max_fr

 static bool intel_pstate_update_max_freq(struct cpudata *cpudata)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
-
-	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
 	if (!policy)
 		return false;