linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] perf tests: Fix "PE file support" test build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250903-james-perf-read-build-id-fix-v1-1-6a694d0a980f@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 16:15:26 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, 
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, 
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf tests: Fix "PE file support" test build

filename__read_build_id() now takes a blocking/non-blocking argument.
The original behavior of filename__read_build_id() was blocking so add
block=true to fix the build.

Fixes: 2c369d91d093 ("perf symbol: Add blocking argument to filename__read_build_id")
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
---
 tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c
index 30c7da79e109..8b31d1d05f90 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int run_dir(const char *d)
 	size_t idx;
 
 	scnprintf(filename, PATH_MAX, "%s/pe-file.exe", d);
-	ret = filename__read_build_id(filename, &bid);
+	ret = filename__read_build_id(filename, &bid, /*block=*/true);
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Failed to read build_id",
 			ret == sizeof(expect_build_id));
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Wrong build_id", !memcmp(bid.data, expect_build_id,
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int run_dir(const char *d)
 			!strcmp(debuglink, expect_debuglink));
 
 	scnprintf(debugfile, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", d, debuglink);
-	ret = filename__read_build_id(debugfile, &bid);
+	ret = filename__read_build_id(debugfile, &bid, /*block=*/true);
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Failed to read debug file build_id",
 			ret == sizeof(expect_build_id));
 	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Wrong build_id", !memcmp(bid.data, expect_build_id,

-- 
2.34.1