[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c685b0d4-e458-45d2-92e1-ac6286770427@arnaud-lcm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 01:46:36 +0200
From: "Lecomte, Arnaud" <contact@...aud-lcm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Eduard <eddyz87@...il.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Stanislav Fomichev
<sdf@...ichev.me>, syzbot+c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/2] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in
bpf_get_stack()
On 03/09/2025 18:22, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 9:20 AM Lecomte, Arnaud <contact@...aud-lcm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 03/09/2025 18:12, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 6:52 AM Arnaud Lecomte <contact@...aud-lcm.com> wrote:
>>>> A new helper function stack_map_calculate_max_depth() that
>>>> computes the max depth for a stackmap.
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - Removed the checking 'map_size % map_elem_size' from
>>>> stack_map_calculate_max_depth
>>>> - Changed stack_map_calculate_max_depth params name to be more generic
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - Changed map size param to size in max depth helper
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>> - Fixed indentation in max depth helper for args
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>> - Bound back trace_nr to num_elem in __bpf_get_stack
>>>> - Make a copy of sysctl_perf_event_max_stack
>>>> in stack_map_calculate_max_depth
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>> - Restrained max_depth computation only when required
>>>> - Additional cleanup from Song in __bpf_get_stack
>>> This is not a refactor anymore.
>>> Pls don't squash different things into one patch.
>>> Keep refactor as patch 1, and another cleanup as patch 2.
>> The main problem is that patch 2 is not a cleanup too. It is a bug fix
>> so it doesn't really
>> fit either.
>> We could maybe split this patch into 2 new patches but I don't really
>> like this idea.
>> If we decide to stick to 2 patches format, I don't have any preference
>> which patch's scope
>> should be extended.
> I wasn't proposing to squash cleanup into patch 2.
> Make 3 patches where each one is doing one thing.
I've sent it:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250903233910.29431-1-contact@arnaud-lcm.com/
Thanks !
Arnaud
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists