[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZBCxp4rT=es3fDh2w1Ut=i4u3GCnyoOFjqJEMj3CLWPWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:22:14 +0300
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add support for System
Manager API
<snip>
> >Please give detailed suggestions, but not a general comment.
>
>
> @Daniel, @Frank — since you've reviewed and R-b'd this patchset, do you
> have thoughts on the latest feedback from Mathieu? Would you agree that
> further simplification is needed, or is the current structure acceptable?”
Peng, please trim the message when replying so that you keep only
relevant part of the text.
I think you are both right here. I understand your frustration :)
but also Mathieu's point of view is reasonable.
For a person who doesn't know the internals of IMX remoteproc the code
is a little
bit hard to understand. Peng I've given you my R-b because even if the
feels like
it is getting complicated it is still manageable and you are the
maintainer for it.
Allow me a few days to see if we can simplify the logic.
thanks,
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists