linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: pf530x: dt-bindings: nxp,pf530x-regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bd06ea10-dea6-49a8-810e-2b8c089933fd@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:34:06 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Woodrow Douglass <wdouglass@...negierobotics.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: pf530x: dt-bindings:
 nxp,pf530x-regulator

On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 08:16:21AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/09/2025 23:17, Woodrow Douglass wrote:

> > Bindings for the pf530x series of voltage regulators

> Nothing improved and you sent it AFTER you received my feedback.

He said in the cover letter that he was resending copying in the lists
as per your request and would follow up with another verision with the
changes we both requested.  Obviously it'd have been better to just send
that version or at least tag this as a resend but I do understand the
confusion.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)