linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aLgY1z-MvQbDBx2_@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 13:30:47 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jean-François Lessard <jefflessard3@...il.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node
 iterators

On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 03:04:38PM -0400, Jean-François Lessard wrote:
> This series adds scoped versions of fwnode iterator macros and converts
> existing manual implementation to use them.
> 
> The first patch adds the infrastructure macros following existing patterns
> for scoped iterators in the kernel. The second patch demonstrates
> fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped() usage by converting existing manual
> __free() usage in i2c-core-slave.c.
> 
> This series introduces infrastructure for the TM16XX driver series,
> being the first user of fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped().
> See the related patch series:
>   auxdisplay: Add TM16xx 7-segment LED matrix display controllers driver

It might be good to have an immutable branch for me from i2c core.
Wolfram, can you provide a such if no objections?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko