[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d597234-f858-4527-b6fd-111356af3705@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 19:21:01 +0800
From: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <horms@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Add sanity checks on
ipv6_devconf.seg6_enabled
Sorry, pls ignore this error patch.
On 2025/9/3 17:39, Yue Haibing wrote:
> In ipv6_srh_rcv() we use min(net->ipv6.devconf_all->seg6_enabled,
> idev->cnf.seg6_enabled) is intended to return 0 when either value is zero,
> but if one of the values is negative it will in fact return non-zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 40e9c336f6c5..87f14532cb7e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -7193,6 +7193,8 @@ static const struct ctl_table addrconf_sysctl[] = {
> .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> + .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> },
> #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC
> {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists