linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] regulator: pf530x: dt-bindings: nxp,pf530x-regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c4402946-9b76-4e1f-9a03-e5985cb023a3@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:33:24 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Woodrow Douglass <wdouglass@...negierobotics.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] regulator: pf530x: dt-bindings:
 nxp,pf530x-regulator

On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 07:44:57AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/09/2025 22:03, Woodrow Douglass wrote:

> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - nxp,pf5300
> > +      - nxp,pf5301
> > +      - nxp,pf5302

> Still compatibility not expressed.

> Please respond to comments.

He did reply to this in the cover letter (possibly for v3?) explaining
that he couldn't understand what you are talking about, the devices have
the same register interface but differ in the rated current.  TBH I
can't really understand what the issue is either, perhaps if you could
suggest a concrete change you're looking for?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)