[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLmIZ1qHWBjpiNjH@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 15:39:03 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Jean-François Lessard <jefflessard3@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node
iterators
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 02:54:40PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> I noticed there's also no availability check for the OF graph nodes. That's
> likely an accidental omission.
After doing some further research, this seems to be correct. In OF, the
status is defined for device nodes only. A child node could be a device
whereas graph endpoints are not device nodes, so the lack of a check there
is reasonable.
--
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists