[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250904140631.gxhaxwjjmexexj4t@test-PowerEdge-R740xd>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 19:36:31 +0530
From: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@...sung.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com,
a.manzanares@...sung.com, vishak.g@...sung.com, neeraj.kernel@...il.com,
cpgs@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 05/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label updation
routine
On 13/08/25 03:48PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:41:54 +0530
>Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@...sung.com> wrote:
>
>> Added __pmem_region_label_update region label update routine to update
>> region label.
>>
>> Also used guard(mutex)(&nd_mapping->lock) in place of mutex_lock() and
>> mutex_unlock()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@...sung.com>
>
>A few comments inline,
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jonathan
>
>
>> static bool slot_valid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>> struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label, u32 slot)
>> {
>> @@ -960,7 +970,7 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>> return rc;
>>
>> /* Garbage collect the previous label */
>> - mutex_lock(&nd_mapping->lock);
>> + guard(mutex)(&nd_mapping->lock);
>> list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) {
>> if (!label_ent->label)
>> continue;
>> @@ -972,20 +982,20 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>> /* update index */
>> rc = nd_label_write_index(ndd, ndd->ns_next,
>> nd_inc_seq(__le32_to_cpu(nsindex->seq)), 0);
>> - if (rc == 0) {
>> - list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list)
>> - if (!label_ent->label) {
>> - label_ent->label = lsa_label;
>> - lsa_label = NULL;
>> - break;
>> - }
>> - dev_WARN_ONCE(&nspm->nsio.common.dev, lsa_label,
>> - "failed to track label: %d\n",
>> - to_slot(ndd, lsa_label));
>> - if (lsa_label)
>> - rc = -ENXIO;
>> - }
>> - mutex_unlock(&nd_mapping->lock);
>> + if (rc)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list)
>> + if (!label_ent->label) {
>> + label_ent->label = lsa_label;
>> + lsa_label = NULL;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + dev_WARN_ONCE(&nspm->nsio.common.dev, lsa_label,
>> + "failed to track label: %d\n",
>> + to_slot(ndd, lsa_label));
>> + if (lsa_label)
>> + rc = -ENXIO;
> if (lsa_label)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> return 0;
>
>is a little clearer.
Sure, I will fix it in next patch-set
>
>>
>> return rc;
>> }
>> @@ -1127,6 +1137,137 @@ int nd_pmem_namespace_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int __pmem_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>> + struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, int pos, unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> + struct nd_interleave_set *nd_set = nd_region->nd_set;
>> + struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping);
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label;
>> + struct cxl_region_label *rg_label;
>> + struct nd_namespace_index *nsindex;
>> + struct nd_label_ent *label_ent;
>> + unsigned long *free;
>> + u32 nslot, slot;
>> + size_t offset;
>> + int rc;
>> + uuid_t tmp;
>> +
>> + if (!preamble_next(ndd, &nsindex, &free, &nslot))
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> + /* allocate and write the label to the staging (next) index */
>> + slot = nd_label_alloc_slot(ndd);
>> + if (slot == UINT_MAX)
>> + return -ENXIO;
>> + dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "allocated: %d\n", slot);
>> +
>> + nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
>> +
>> + memset(nd_label, 0, sizeof_namespace_label(ndd));
>> + rg_label = &nd_label->rg_label;
>> +
>> + /* Set Region Label Format identification UUID */
>> + uuid_parse(CXL_REGION_UUID, &tmp);
>> + export_uuid(nd_label->rg_label.type, &tmp);
>
> export_uuid(rg_label->type, &tmp);
Thanks Jonathan, I will fix it in next patch-set
>
>> +
>> + /* Set Current Region Label UUID */
>> + export_uuid(nd_label->rg_label.uuid, &nd_set->uuid);
>
> export_uuid(rg_label->uuid, &nd_set->uuid);
Sure, I will fix it in next patch-set
>
>
>> +
>> + rg_label->flags = __cpu_to_le32(flags);
>> + rg_label->nlabel = __cpu_to_le16(nd_region->ndr_mappings);
>> + rg_label->position = __cpu_to_le16(pos);
>> + rg_label->dpa = __cpu_to_le64(nd_mapping->start);
>> + rg_label->rawsize = __cpu_to_le64(nd_mapping->size);
>> + rg_label->hpa = __cpu_to_le64(nd_set->res->start);
>> + rg_label->slot = __cpu_to_le32(slot);
>> + rg_label->ig = __cpu_to_le32(nd_set->interleave_granularity);
>> + rg_label->align = __cpu_to_le16(0);
>
>As the bot complained... It's le32
Yes, I will fix it in next patch-set
>
>> +
>> + /* Update fletcher64 Checksum */
>> + rgl_calculate_checksum(ndd, rg_label);
>> +
>> + /* update label */
>> + offset = nd_label_offset(ndd, nd_label);
>> + rc = nvdimm_set_config_data(ndd, offset, nd_label,
>> + sizeof_namespace_label(ndd));
>> + if (rc < 0) {
>> + nd_label_free_slot(ndd, slot);
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Garbage collect the previous label */
>> + guard(mutex)(&nd_mapping->lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) {
>> + if (!label_ent->label)
>> + continue;
>> + if (rgl_uuid_equal(&label_ent->label->rg_label, &nd_set->uuid))
>> + reap_victim(nd_mapping, label_ent);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* update index */
>> + rc = nd_label_write_index(ndd, ndd->ns_next,
>> + nd_inc_seq(__le32_to_cpu(nsindex->seq)), 0);
>> + if (rc)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list)
>> + if (!label_ent->label) {
>> + label_ent->label = nd_label;
>> + nd_label = NULL;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + dev_WARN_ONCE(&nd_region->dev, nd_label,
>> + "failed to track label: %d\n",
>> + to_slot(ndd, nd_label));
>> + if (nd_label)
>> + rc = -ENXIO;
>
> return -ENXIO;
>
>> +
>
> return 0;
>
>is clearer.
Sure, I will fix it in next patch-set
>
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int nd_pmem_region_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region)
>> +{
>> + int i, rc;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) {
>> + struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i];
>> + struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping);
>> +
>> + /* No need to update region label for non cxl format */
>> + if (!ndd->cxl)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + /* Init labels to include region label */
>> + rc = init_labels(nd_mapping, 1);
>> +
>
>No blank line here - keep the error check closely associated with the
>thing that it is checking.
Sure, I will fix it in next patch-set
>
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + rc = __pmem_region_label_update(nd_region, nd_mapping, i,
>> + NSLABEL_FLAG_UPDATING);
>> +
>
>Same here.
Sure, I will fix it in next patch-set
>
>> + if (rc)
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Clear the UPDATING flag per UEFI 2.7 expectations */
>> + for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) {
>> + struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i];
>> + struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping);
>> +
>> + /* No need to update region label for non cxl format */
>> + if (!ndd->cxl)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + rc = __pmem_region_label_update(nd_region, nd_mapping, i, 0);
>> +
>
>and here.
Sure, I will fix it in next patch-set
>
>> + if (rc)
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> int __init nd_label_init(void)
>> {
>> WARN_ON(guid_parse(NVDIMM_BTT_GUID, &nvdimm_btt_guid));
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.h b/drivers/nvdimm/label.h
>> index 4883b3a1320f..0f428695017d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.h
>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.h
>> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ struct nd_namespace_label {
>> struct nd_lsa_label {
>
>Would be better to have this explicitly as a union
>unless later patches add more elements. That way it'll
>be obvious at all sites where it is used that it can be one
>of several things.
>
>> union {
>> struct nd_namespace_label ns_label;
>> + struct cxl_region_label rg_label;
>> };
>> };
Thanks Jonathan for your suggestion. I will revisit this change and try
using region label handling separately instead of using union.
Regards,
Neeraj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists