[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21b618d5-7f6c-4b06-81be-eea6cbac5ba6@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:26:30 -0600
From: Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@...cle.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_CLONE_FILTER operation
On 9/3/25 4:44 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 1:52 PM Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/3/25 2:45 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 1:38 PM Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
>>>> + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (atomic_read(&task->seccomp.filter_count) == 0) {
>>>> + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
>>>> + spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
>>>
>>> did you copy this pattern from somewhere ?
>>> It's obviously buggy.
>>
>> I tried to mimic the logic in copy_seccomp() in kernel/fork.c,
>> but as you point out, I probably messed it up :).
>>
>> Do you have recommendations for a better design pattern?
>
> Several things look wrong here.
> Double _irq() is one obvious bug.
This snippet addresses the double irq issue. I also added a
check to make sure that task != current. (A user shouldn't
do that but who knows what they'll actually do.)
if (task == current) {
put_task_struct(task);
return -EINVAL;
}
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
spin_lock(&task->sighand->siglock);
if (atomic_read(&task->seccomp.filter_count) == 0) {
spin_unlock(&task->sighand->siglock);
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
put_task_struct(task);
return -EINVAL;
}
get_seccomp_filter(task);
current->seccomp = task->seccomp;
spin_unlock(&task->sighand->siglock);
set_task_syscall_work(current, SECCOMP);
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
Let me know if there are other fixes I need to add.
Thanks so much!
Tom
Powered by blists - more mailing lists