lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250904143440.l5fca2dgvmi2c325@test-PowerEdge-R740xd>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 20:04:40 +0530
From: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@...sung.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com,
	a.manzanares@...sung.com, vishak.g@...sung.com, neeraj.kernel@...il.com,
	cpgs@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 12/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Skip region label
 during namespace creation

On 13/08/25 04:55PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:42:01 +0530
>Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@...sung.com> wrote:
>
>> During namespace creation skip presence of region label if present.
>
>Confusing description.  What does skipping presence mean?
>Reword.
>
>During namespace creation, skip any region labels found.

Thanks Jonathan, I will fix it in next patch-set

>
>
>> Also preserve region label into labels list if present.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@...sung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
>> index e5c2f78ca7dd..8edd26407939 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
>> @@ -1985,6 +1985,10 @@ static struct device **scan_labels(struct nd_region *nd_region)
>>  		if (!lsa_label)
>>  			continue;
>>
>> +		/* skip region labels if present */
>
>This is kind of obvious comment. I'd drop it.

Sure, I will drop it in next patch-set


Regards,
Neeraj


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ