linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] regulator: pf530x: NXP PF530x regulator driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <462637d8-ce9d-4ba8-a6cf-a5e59e7ffd26@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 15:42:59 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Woody Douglass <wdouglass@...negierobotics.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] regulator: pf530x: NXP PF530x regulator driver

On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 02:20:05PM +0000, Woody Douglass wrote:

> I will configure the web relay for future patches, thank you! Should I resubmit patch v5, or is the
> fact that it's on the lkml archive good enough? it's at
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250902-pf530x-v5-0-658c403e6a52@carnegierobotics.com/

It came through fine here so I don't need a resend.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)