[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2877287-d456-44d2-b8ee-be1f27b35a9b@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 07:58:24 -0700
From: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
scott@...amperecomputing.com, cl@...two.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/6] arm64: mm: Optimize linear_map_split_to_ptes()
On 9/4/25 4:10 AM, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 29/08/2025 23:27, Yang Shi wrote:
>>
>> On 8/29/25 4:52 AM, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>> When splitting kernel leaf mappings, either via
>>> split_kernel_leaf_mapping_locked() or linear_map_split_to_ptes(),
>>> previously a leaf mapping was always split to the next size down. e.g.
>>> pud -> contpmd -> pmd -> contpte -> pte. But for
>>> linear_map_split_to_ptes() we can avoid the contpmd and contpte states
>>> because we know we want to split all the way down to ptes.
>>>
>>> This avoids visiting all the ptes in a table if it was created by
>>> splitting a pmd, which is noticible on systems with a lot of memory.
>> Similar to patch #4, this patch should be squashed into patch #5 IMHO.
> That's fine by me. I was just trying to make the review easier by splitting
> non-essential stuff out. Let's squash for next version.
Understood.
Thanks,
Yang
>
>> Thanks,
>> Yang
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>> index 6bd0b065bd97..8e45cd08bf3a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static void split_contpte(pte_t *ptep)
>>> __set_pte(ptep, pte_mknoncont(__ptep_get(ptep)));
>>> }
>>> -static int split_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, gfp_t gfp)
>>> +static int split_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, gfp_t gfp, bool to_cont)
>>> {
>>> pmdval_t tableprot = PMD_TYPE_TABLE | PMD_TABLE_UXN | PMD_TABLE_AF;
>>> unsigned long pfn = pmd_pfn(pmd);
>>> @@ -568,7 +568,9 @@ static int split_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd, gfp_t gfp)
>>> tableprot |= PMD_TABLE_PXN;
>>> prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_TYPE_MASK) | PTE_TYPE_PAGE);
>>> - prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
>>> + prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_CONT);
>>> + if (to_cont)
>>> + prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
>>> for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++, ptep++, pfn++)
>>> __set_pte(ptep, pfn_pte(pfn, prot));
>>> @@ -592,7 +594,7 @@ static void split_contpmd(pmd_t *pmdp)
>>> set_pmd(pmdp, pmd_mknoncont(pmdp_get(pmdp)));
>>> }
>>> -static int split_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud, gfp_t gfp)
>>> +static int split_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud, gfp_t gfp, bool to_cont)
>>> {
>>> pudval_t tableprot = PUD_TYPE_TABLE | PUD_TABLE_UXN | PUD_TABLE_AF;
>>> unsigned int step = PMD_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> @@ -611,7 +613,9 @@ static int split_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud, gfp_t gfp)
>>> tableprot |= PUD_TABLE_PXN;
>>> prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PMD_TYPE_MASK) | PMD_TYPE_SECT);
>>> - prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
>>> + prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~PTE_CONT);
>>> + if (to_cont)
>>> + prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
>>> for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PMD; i++, pmdp++, pfn += step)
>>> set_pmd(pmdp, pfn_pmd(pfn, prot));
>>> @@ -669,7 +673,7 @@ static int split_kernel_leaf_mapping_locked(unsigned long
>>> addr)
>>> if (!pud_present(pud))
>>> goto out;
>>> if (pud_leaf(pud)) {
>>> - ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL);
>>> + ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL, true);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> @@ -694,7 +698,7 @@ static int split_kernel_leaf_mapping_locked(unsigned long
>>> addr)
>>> */
>>> if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PMD_SIZE) == addr)
>>> goto out;
>>> - ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL);
>>> + ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL, true);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> @@ -771,7 +775,7 @@ static int __init split_to_ptes_pud_entry(pud_t *pudp,
>>> unsigned long addr,
>>> int ret = 0;
>>> if (pud_leaf(pud))
>>> - ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>> + ret = split_pud(pudp, pud, GFP_ATOMIC, false);
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> @@ -786,7 +790,13 @@ static int __init split_to_ptes_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmdp,
>>> unsigned long addr,
>>> if (pmd_leaf(pmd)) {
>>> if (pmd_cont(pmd))
>>> split_contpmd(pmdp);
>>> - ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>> + ret = split_pmd(pmdp, pmd, GFP_ATOMIC, false);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * We have split the pmd directly to ptes so there is no need to
>>> + * visit each pte to check if they are contpte.
>>> + */
>>> + walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE;
>>> }
>>> return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists