lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175700470013.101252.2850768839303017703.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 17:51:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>, 
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.dev>, 
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: qcom: q6apm-lpass-dais: Fix NULL pointer
 dereference if source graph failed

On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 12:18:50 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> If earlier opening of source graph fails (e.g. ADSP rejects due to
> incorrect audioreach topology), the graph is closed and
> "dai_data->graph[dai->id]" is assigned NULL.  Preparing the DAI for sink
> graph continues though and next call to q6apm_lpass_dai_prepare()
> receives dai_data->graph[dai->id]=NULL leading to NULL pointer
> exception:
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: qcom: q6apm-lpass-dais: Fix NULL pointer dereference if source graph failed
      commit: 68f27f7c7708183e7873c585ded2f1b057ac5b97

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ