lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ecdf72c0856f79142af5d951c7cb479cba6c8fb3.camel@ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 18:32:07 +0000
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
To: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@...hat.com>,
        "ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org"
	<ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "idryomov@...il.com" <idryomov@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:  [PATCH v2 2/2] ceph/inode: drop extra reference from
 ceph_get_reply_dir() in ceph_fill_trace()

On Thu, 2025-09-04 at 10:12 +0000, Alex Markuze wrote:
> ceph_get_reply_dir() may return a different, referenced inode when r_parent is stale and the parent directory lock is not held.
> ceph_fill_trace() used that inode but failed to drop the reference when it differed from req->r_parent, leaking an inode reference.
> 
> Keep the directory inode in a local and iput() it at function end if it does not match req->r_parent.

I assume that you mean "in a local variable"?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@...hat.com>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/inode.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/inode.c b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> index 470ee595ecf2..cffa2cd7b530 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> @@ -1584,6 +1584,7 @@ int ceph_fill_trace(struct super_block *sb, struct ceph_mds_request *req)
>  	struct ceph_vino tvino, dvino;
>  	struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = ceph_sb_to_fs_client(sb);
>  	struct ceph_client *cl = fsc->client;
> +	struct inode *parent_dir = NULL;
>  	int err = 0;
>  
>  	doutc(cl, "%p is_dentry %d is_target %d\n", req,
> @@ -1601,9 +1602,13 @@ int ceph_fill_trace(struct super_block *sb, struct ceph_mds_request *req)
>  		 * r_parent may be stale, in cases when R_PARENT_LOCKED is not set,
>  		 * so we need to get the correct inode
>  		 */
> -		struct inode *dir = ceph_get_reply_dir(sb, req->r_parent, rinfo);
> -		if (dir) {
> -			err = ceph_fill_inode(dir, NULL, &rinfo->diri,
> +		parent_dir = ceph_get_reply_dir(sb, req->r_parent, rinfo);
> +		if (unlikely(IS_ERR(parent_dir))) {
> +			err = PTR_ERR(parent_dir);
> +			goto done;
> +		}
> +		if (parent_dir) {
> +			err = ceph_fill_inode(parent_dir, NULL, &rinfo->diri,
>  					      rinfo->dirfrag, session, -1,
>  					      &req->r_caps_reservation);
>  			if (err < 0)
> @@ -1612,14 +1617,14 @@ int ceph_fill_trace(struct super_block *sb, struct ceph_mds_request *req)
>  			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>  		}
>  
> -		if (dir && req->r_op == CEPH_MDS_OP_LOOKUPNAME &&
> +		if (parent_dir && req->r_op == CEPH_MDS_OP_LOOKUPNAME &&
>  		    test_bit(CEPH_MDS_R_PARENT_LOCKED, &req->r_req_flags) &&
>  		    !test_bit(CEPH_MDS_R_ABORTED, &req->r_req_flags)) {
>  			bool is_nokey = false;
>  			struct qstr dname;
>  			struct dentry *dn, *parent;
>  			struct fscrypt_str oname = FSTR_INIT(NULL, 0);
> -			struct ceph_fname fname = { .dir	= dir,
> +			struct ceph_fname fname = { .dir	= parent_dir,
>  						    .name	= rinfo->dname,
>  						    .ctext	= rinfo->altname,
>  						    .name_len	= rinfo->dname_len,
> @@ -1628,10 +1633,10 @@ int ceph_fill_trace(struct super_block *sb, struct ceph_mds_request *req)
>  			BUG_ON(!rinfo->head->is_target);
>  			BUG_ON(req->r_dentry);
>  
> -			parent = d_find_any_alias(dir);
> +			parent = d_find_any_alias(parent_dir);
>  			BUG_ON(!parent);
>  
> -			err = ceph_fname_alloc_buffer(dir, &oname);
> +			err = ceph_fname_alloc_buffer(parent_dir, &oname);
>  			if (err < 0) {
>  				dput(parent);
>  				goto done;
> @@ -1640,7 +1645,7 @@ int ceph_fill_trace(struct super_block *sb, struct ceph_mds_request *req)
>  			err = ceph_fname_to_usr(&fname, NULL, &oname, &is_nokey);
>  			if (err < 0) {
>  				dput(parent);
> -				ceph_fname_free_buffer(dir, &oname);
> +				ceph_fname_free_buffer(parent_dir, &oname);
>  				goto done;
>  			}
>  			dname.name = oname.name;
> @@ -1659,7 +1664,7 @@ int ceph_fill_trace(struct super_block *sb, struct ceph_mds_request *req)
>  				      dname.len, dname.name, dn);
>  				if (!dn) {
>  					dput(parent);
> -					ceph_fname_free_buffer(dir, &oname);
> +					ceph_fname_free_buffer(parent_dir, &oname);
>  					err = -ENOMEM;
>  					goto done;
>  				}
> @@ -1674,12 +1679,12 @@ int ceph_fill_trace(struct super_block *sb, struct ceph_mds_request *req)
>  				    ceph_snap(d_inode(dn)) != tvino.snap)) {
>  				doutc(cl, " dn %p points to wrong inode %p\n",
>  				      dn, d_inode(dn));
> -				ceph_dir_clear_ordered(dir);
> +				ceph_dir_clear_ordered(parent_dir);
>  				d_delete(dn);
>  				dput(dn);
>  				goto retry_lookup;
>  			}
> -			ceph_fname_free_buffer(dir, &oname);
> +			ceph_fname_free_buffer(parent_dir, &oname);
>  
>  			req->r_dentry = dn;
>  			dput(parent);
> @@ -1869,6 +1874,9 @@ int ceph_fill_trace(struct super_block *sb, struct ceph_mds_request *req)
>  					    &dvino, ptvino);
>  	}
>  done:
> +	/* Drop extra ref from ceph_get_reply_dir() if it returned a new inode */
> +	if (unlikely(!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(parent_dir) && parent_dir != req->r_parent))

The '&&' implies to check both conditions. However, if we have parent_dir equal
to NULL or some error code, then it doesn't make sense to check the second
condition. I don't  think that it could introduce some issue here. But,
potentially, it could be the reason of rarely triggered and non-trivial issue.
What do you think? Do I have point here?

What if we can do like this:

parent_dir = parent_dir != req->r_parent ? parent_dir : NULL;
if (parent_dir)
    iput(parent_dir);


> +		iput(parent_dir);

Potentially, we could jump here if we have the error.

>  	doutc(cl, "done err=%d\n", err);
>  	return err;
>  }

Mostly, looks good.

Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>

Thanks,
Slava.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ