linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] pinctrl: qcom: Add glymur pinctrl driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdawjL1CKy776Ya_tZJaurmxRVqx98DGSUZjUWZe=Gdrcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 21:34:02 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	rajendra.nayak@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] pinctrl: qcom: Add glymur pinctrl driver

On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 11:53 AM Pankaj Patil
<pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com> wrote:

> This patch was not pulled in linux-next,
> commit- 9a1d01fbf43f56a02026eee44181f70108a0dec8

No you said you would do changes to 1/2 so I have not applied it,
waiting for v6.

> Does this need a rebase?

Maybe, then use my "devel" branch.

Pick up any ACKs and Review tags please!

Yours,
Linus Walleij