lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250904145925.101e2091@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 14:59:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, asantostc@...il.com, efault@....de,
 calvin@...nvd.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: selftest: Introduce netconsole
 torture test

On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 11:00:39 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> Create a netconsole test that puts a lot of pressure on the netconsole
> list manipulation. Do it by creating dynamic targets and deleting
> targets while messages are being sent. Also put interface down while the
> 
> In order to do it, refactor create_dynamic_target(), so it can be used to
> create random targets in the torture test.

You either have to post it in the same series as the fix, or wait for
the fix to be present in net-next. Without your pending fix this will
obviously not pass thru the CI :/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ