[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250904002126.1514566-15-wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:21:11 +0800
From: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 14/18] mm/ksw: add stack overflow test
Extend the test module with a new test case (test1) that intentionally
overflows a local u64 buffer to corrupt the stack canary. This helps
validate KStackWatch's detection of stack corruption under overflow
conditions.
The proc interface is updated to document the new test:
- test1: stack canary overflow test
Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
---
mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c b/mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c
index bba2ab8530ed..138163472b03 100644
--- a/mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c
+++ b/mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c
@@ -42,6 +42,27 @@ static void canary_test_write(void)
pr_info("KSW: test: canary write test completed\n");
}
+/*
+ * Test Case 1: Stack Overflow (Canary Test)
+ * This function uses a u64 buffer 64-bit write
+ * to corrupt the stack canary with a single operation
+ */
+static void canary_test_overflow(void)
+{
+ u64 buffer[BUFFER_SIZE];
+
+ pr_info("KSW: test: starting %s with u64 write\n", __func__);
+ pr_info("KSW: test: buffer 0x%px\n", buffer);
+
+ /* intentionally overflow the u64 buffer. */
+ buffer[BUFFER_SIZE] = 0xdeadbeefdeadbeef;
+
+ /* make sure the compiler do not drop assign action */
+ barrier_data(buffer);
+
+ pr_info("KSW: test: canary overflow test completed\n");
+}
+
static ssize_t test_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
size_t count, loff_t *pos)
{
@@ -65,7 +86,10 @@ static ssize_t test_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
pr_info("KSW: test: triggering canary write test\n");
canary_test_write();
break;
-
+ case 1:
+ pr_info("KSW: test: triggering canary overflow test\n");
+ canary_test_overflow();
+ break;
default:
pr_err("KSW: test: Unknown test number %d\n", test_num);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -85,7 +109,8 @@ static ssize_t test_proc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
"KStackWatch Simplified Test Module\n"
"==================================\n"
"Usage:\n"
- " echo 'test0' > /proc/kstackwatch_test - canary write test\n";
+ " echo 'test0' > /proc/kstackwatch_test - Canary write test\n"
+ " echo 'test1' > /proc/kstackwatch_test - Canary overflow test\n";
return simple_read_from_buffer(buffer, count, pos, usage,
strlen(usage));
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists