linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250904-interesting-lovely-ringtail-38bbef@kuoka>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:48:14 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@...sung.com>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, 
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, 
	andre.draszik@...aro.org, peter.griffin@...aro.org, kauschluss@...root.org, 
	ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com, igor.belwon@...tallysanemainliners.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, 
	s.nawrocki@...sung.com, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, rosa.pila@...sung.com, dev.tailor@...sung.com, 
	faraz.ata@...sung.com, muhammed.ali@...sung.com, selvarasu.g@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
 ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC. The
> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so no
> driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a dedicated
> compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@...sung.com>

You just dropped all tags without explaining why.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof