[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLlDjmQF0DSOqILw@e129823.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:45:18 +0100
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
Cc: ryabinin.a.a@...il.com, glider@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, corbet@....net, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
scott@...amperecomputing.com, jhubbard@...dia.com,
pankaj.gupta@....com, leitao@...ian.org, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
maz@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
james.morse@....com, ardb@...nel.org,
hardevsinh.palaniya@...iconsignals.io, david@...hat.com,
yang@...amperecomputing.com, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] kasan: apply write-only mode in kasan kunit
testcases
Hi Andrey,
[...]
> > /**
> > - * KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL - check that the executed expression produces a
> > - * KASAN report; causes a KUnit test failure otherwise.
> > + * KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_RESULT - check that the executed expression
> > + * causes a KUnit test failure when the result is different from @fail.
>
> What I meant here was:
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_RESULT - checks whether the executed expression
> produces a KASAN report; causes a KUnit test failure when the result
> is different from @fail.
This is much clear. I'll modified the comment this again.
[...]
> Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
Thanks :)
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists